I don’t have much to say. Just gonna put this out there.
I already posted attorney notes from Bilal’s testimony during the grand jury, but in case there’s still doubt, I kindly refer your attention to the highlighted portions of this document.
Now I know how this will play out. Natasha will say “well he tried to plead the fifth, then the court denied it, and then he actually testified, and THAT’S WHAT I MEANT”. Except its pretty clear that is not what she meant, or Jay meant. She meant that Bilal never testified, and she “verified” it, and she is dead wrong.
*On a related note, someone posted on Reddit that she had a conversation on Facebook messenger with Jay. And The Intercept published a screenshot of that conversation, BUT it had been redacted/messed with. So this person contacted Natasha to tell her she published something that had been doctored by Jay. She provided proof of the original conversation, which included something Jay definitely would not want the public to know (yes, I know exactly what he said that was then redacted). Then she waited patiently for Natasha to make the correction. But Natasha never did. Instead Natasha is claiming that the conversation Jay sent her was a message he shared with his wife about the original message, not the original conversation itself. Sure, it could be possible Jay redacted what he wish he didn’t say and then sent it to his wife. But hard to believe because the conversation Natasha published has the exact same time stamp as the original conversation. Considering the acrobatics Natasha is going through to cover her mistake in this, I won’t be surprised if she does the same with Bilal’s testimony.